13.0384 CD-ROMs in libraries

From: Humanist Discussion Group (willard@lists.village.virginia.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 08 2000 - 20:54:44 CUT

  • Next message: Humanist Discussion Group: "13.0385 new AAUP book titles"

                   Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 13, No. 384.
           Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London

             Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 20:43:55 +0000
             From: "Theodore F. Brunner" <tbrunner@uci.edu>
             Subject: Re: 13.0375 CD-ROMs in libraries

    On Friday, 04 Feb 2000, Charles Faulhaber wrote:

    >CD-ROM disks drive librarians crazy. Large libraries have hundreds if not
    >thousands of them. They all have different software and they all must be
    >installed. Some can run on networks; some can't. They are _much_ more
    >dificult to deal with than printed books for these reasons.....This is a
    >HUGE problem,
    >and no one is close to solving it.

    On February 6, 2000, Leo Robert Klein added:

    >I don't really see how libraries will be able to do much since they're
    >having enough trouble coming to grips with current technology.


    These two comments are an indicator as to how times have changed. In
    October of 1991, I attended an Invitational Symposium on Knowledge
    Management in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia. The vast majority of the
    conference participants were librarians and library administrators; I was
    one of a small handful of professors who attended by virtue of the fact
    that they had been instrumental in creating large-scale electronic
    resources (in my case, the Thesaurus Linguae Graecae data bank,
    disseminated on CD ROM).

    Throughout the three-day meeting, the librarians kept maintaining the
    following: The professors should be allowed to crate their electronic data
    banks and CD ROMS, but once they had done their duty, they should, much
    like the Moor in Othello, disappear from the scene and let the librarians
    take over. Librarians, it was held, are far better equipped to manage
    scholarly resources--electronic or otherwise--than professors.

    My own response was drawn from Wilhelm Busch--"Vater werden ist nicht
    schwer, Vater sein dagegen sehr," i.e.,the difficulties posed by data bank
    creation are nothing compared to those inherent in data bank maintenance
    and enhancement; keeping scholarly data banks viable in long-range terms
    means keeping abreast not only of technological change but also of
    scholarly progress, and librarians should not be charged with the former
    task and could not be charged with the latter.

    My views were deemed to be derogatory of librarians. Librarians, I was
    told, most certainly could handle any potential problems arising out of
    technological progress, and producing periodic "new and improved editions"
    of CD ROMS was, once the original CD ROM was in hand, not really such a big
    deal--librarian could handle that also. The latter assertion, in
    particular, caused me some concern. In any event, I turned out to be the
    bete noir of the conference.

    I doubt very much that the Berkeley Springs Symposium participants would
    still hold the same views they held in 1991, were they to reconvene in 2000.

    Ted Brunner

    Theodore F. Brunner
    Professor Emeritus of Classics
    28802 Top of the World Drive
    Laguna Beach, CA 92651
    Phone (949) 494-8861

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 08 2000 - 21:02:10 CUT