14.0042 "lorem ipsum" et al. ad risum

From: Humanist Discussion Group (willard@lists.village.virginia.edu)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 05:23:40 CUT

  • Next message: Humanist Discussion Group: "14.0043 e-editions of letters? WWW e-books with multimedia?"

                    Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 14, No. 42.
           Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London

       [1] From: viscom@parma.org (Director of Communications, (5)
                     Eparchy of Parma)
             Subject: Lorem ipsum

       [2] From: "Osher Doctorow" <osher@ix.netcom.com> (6)
             Subject: Re: 14.0036 applause for argumenta ad risum

             Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 06:12:48 +0100
             From: viscom@parma.org (Director of Communications, Eparchy of Parma)
             Subject: Lorem ipsum

    [This apparently in response to a very old question. --WM]

    Looks as though this site has the answer to your question.


    Director of communications

             Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 06:13:34 +0100
             From: "Osher Doctorow" <osher@ix.netcom.com>
             Subject: Re: 14.0036 applause for argumenta ad risum

    From: Osher Doctorow osher@ix.netcom.com, Sat. May 27, 2000, 7:05AM

    Dear Colleagues:

    Jim Marchand's list of fallacies is very useful. I would add "appeal to the
    mainstream", "appeal to mainstream Peer Reviewers", "appeal to the Chair,"
    among others.

    Yours truly (as opposed to falsely, of course),


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 06:24:08 CUT