15.046 fsconcordance? "Internet researcher"?

From: by way of Willard McCarty (willard@lists.village.Virginia.EDU)
Date: Fri May 25 2001 - 01:15:44 EDT

  • Next message: by way of Willard McCarty: "15.047 new on WWW: model art history assignments"

                    Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 15, No. 46.
           Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                   <http://www.princeton.edu/~mccarty/humanist/>
                  <http://www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/>

       [1] From: "Kirk Lowery" <kirk@leningradensis.org> (11)
             Subject: fsconcordance?

       [2] From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk> (18)
             Subject: "Internet researcher"?

    --[1]------------------------------------------------------------------
             Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 06:07:46 +0100
             From: "Kirk Lowery" <kirk@leningradensis.org>
             Subject: fsconcordance?

    Apparently, the UPenn server no longer has Meng Weng Wong's Perl
    concordancer "fsconcordance.pl". I've looked *everywhere*.

    If someone could send me a copy, or point me to a working URL, I'd be
    grateful.

    TIA.

    Kirk
    ________________________________________________________________________
    Kirk E. Lowery, Ph.D. <Kirk@leningradensis.org>
    Associate Director, Westminster Hebrew Institute
    General Editor, Project "eL", The XML Leningrad Codex
    Chair, Computer Assisted Research Group, Society of Biblical Literature

    --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------
             Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 06:09:52 +0100
             From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty@kcl.ac.uk>
             Subject: "Internet researcher"?

    Recently I was asked to look at something that referred to the designation
    "Internet researcher". I immediately felt puzzled and have subsequently
    been attempting to figure out why I find this designation odd. Of course
    feelings are notoriously unreliable and difficult to share, but those that
    persist do nag as to source, and being bothered by words can point to
    significant connotations. One does run into dodgy contexts, such as sent to
    me recently by quiteironic@netwow.com, an advert for Internet Investigator,
    which promises to allow you the user access to information about
    "neighbors, enemies, friends, debtors, employees, your boss, yourself,
    relatives, former school or military buddies, even a new love interest!"
    Net-wow indeed (but with no detectable irony). But I don't think that such
    contexts are responsible for my puzzlement. Any ideas?

    Yours,
    WM

    -----
    Dr Willard McCarty / Centre for Computing in the Humanities /
    King's College London / Strand / London WC2R 2LS / U.K. /
    voice: +44 (0)20 7848-2784 / fax: +44 (0)20 7848-2980 /
    ilex.cc.kcl.ac.uk/wlm/ maui gratias agere

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri May 25 2001 - 01:21:48 EDT