18.215 Nature debate on open access

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:04:44 +0100

               Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 18, No. 215.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                     Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu

         Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:13:39 +0100
         From: "DECLAN BUTLER, NATURE" <d.butler_at_nature-france.com>
         Subject: Re: Nature Web Debate on Open Access

Dear Colleagues
I thought I'd let you know that the Nature Web focus on access wrapped up
I've appended the final Table of Contents below.
Best regards

Declan Butler
19 March 2004

Experiments in publishing
 From Nature 9 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/34.html>The pros and
cons of Open Access
Kate Worlock
13 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/32.html>The orthodoxy of
Open Access
John Ewing
13 September 2004

publishing: what do authors want?
Ian Rowlands, Dave Nicholas and Paul Huntingdon
13 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/30.html>What do
societies do with their publishing surpluses?
Christine Baldwin and Sally Morris
13 September 2004

publishing models and the public good
Bernard Rous
13 September 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/29.html>Britain decides
'open access' is still an open issue
Declan Butler
 From Nature 22 July 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/28.html>The best
business model for scholarly journals:
an economist's perspective
Mark J. McCabe and Christopher M. Snyder
16 July 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/27.html>A professional
society's take on access to the
scientific literature
Bettie Sue Masters and Judith S. Bond
8 July 2004

evidence-based assessment of the 'author pays' model
Donald W. King and Carol Tenopir
University of Pittsburgh/Tennessee
25 June 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/25.html>PNAS and Open
Nicholas R. Cozzarelli
University of California at Berkeley
25 June 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/24.html>The primacy of
authors in achieving Open Access
Peter Suber
10 June 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/23.html>Not so quiet on
a Western front
Daniel Greenstein
University of California
28 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/22.html>Can 'author
pays' journals compete with 'reader pays'?
T.C. Bergstrom and C.T Bergstrom
Universities of California, and Washington
20 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/21.html>The green and
the gold roads to Open Access
Stevan Harnad et al.
17 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/20.html>Can Open Access
be viable?
The Institute of Physics' experience
John Haynes
IOP Publishing Ltd
7 May 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/19.html>Do Open Access
journals have impact?
James Pringle
Thomson ISI
7 May 2004

launches CrossRef Search, powered By Google
Ed Pentz
29 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/18.html>Analysing the
scientific literature in its online
Jon Kleinberg
Cornell University
29 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/16.html>Open Access
needs to get 'back to basics'
Leo Waaijers
23 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/15.html>Open Access
ignoring lessons of dot-com bubble
Marie Meyer
22 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/14.html>Is free affordable?
John B. Hawley
Journal of Clinical Investigation
15 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/13.html>Open access by
the article: an idea whose time has come?
Thomas J. Walker
University of Florida
15 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/11.html>How journals can
'realistically' boost access
Ira Mellman
Editor-in-Chief, The Journal of Cell Biology
8 April 2004

with Open Access publishing
Martin Richardson and Claire Saxby
Oxford University Press
8 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/9.html>On being
scientific about science publishing
Ann Okerson
Associate University Librarian,Yale University
1 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/10.html>The myth of
'unsustainable' Open Access journals
Jan Velterop
BioMed Central
1 April 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/8.html>Open access and
learned Societies
Will open access prove a blessing or a curse to learned societies?
Kate Worlock
25 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/7.html>Why electronic
publishing means people will pay different prices
Andrew Odlyzko
Digital Technology Center, University of Minnesota
25 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/2.html>Open access and
not-for-profit publishers
Sally Morris
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
19 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/3.html>Open Access: yes,
no, maybe
Karen Hunter
19 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/4.html>Universities' own
electronic repositories yet to impact on Open Access
Mark Ware
Publishing Consultant
19 March 2004

<http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/5.html>PLoS co-founder
defends free dissemination of peer-reviewed journals online
Patrick Brown
Public Library of Science
19 March 2004


editor-in-chief warns of PLoS growing pains
Donald Kennedy
19 March 2004

Declan Butler
European correspondent, Nature
7 rue Guy de la Brosse
75005 Paris, France
Tel: (33) 1 43 36 59 90

E-mail: d.butler_at_nature.com or
Received on Wed Sep 15 2004 - 03:17:43 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 15 2004 - 03:17:45 EDT