Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 18, No. 425.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
www.kcl.ac.uk/humanities/cch/humanist/
www.princeton.edu/humanist/
Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:37:38 +0000
From: Qsums_at_aol.com
Subject: Re: 18.423 text-analysis in the news
Either in The Guardian or on Radio 4's Today programme, one of the
researchers said that they used Murdoch's handwritten manuscript (I realise
I've redundancy here but wanted to make it clear).
Michael Farringdon
qsums_at_aol.com
In a message dated 13/12/04 8:13:12 am, willard_at_LISTS.VILLAGE.VIRGINIA.EDU
writes:
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:10:32 +0000
> From: Norman Hinton <hinton_at_springnet1.com>
> >
>Willard, while they were studying Iris Murdoch's last novel, did they take
>into consideration changes made by copy editors and the like ? Or of that
>last run-through in which a publisher may try to get the author to re-write
>(often quickly, under extreme time pressure) to make the gathers come out
>right and save money ? There is no guarantee that any particular
>grammatical complexity is the work of the author, or even vice versa.
Received on Tue Dec 14 2004 - 04:57:08 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 14 2004 - 04:57:13 EST