19.153 what's fit for publication

From: Humanist Discussion Group (by way of Willard McCarty willard.mccarty_at_kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 07:04:30 +0100

               Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 19, No. 153.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                     Submit to: humanist_at_princeton.edu

         Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:56:55 +0100
         From: Norman Hinton <hinton_at_springnet1.com>
         Subject: Re: 19.148 Perfect phylogenetic networks?

I don't know why Yuri Tambotsev equates thinking an article was "well
done" with liking the article. As a reader for scholars journals, i
see lots of articles that are well done, and many that are acceptable
for publication -- but I don't agree with them and/or don't like
them. This does not stop me from recommending publication.
Received on Mon Jul 18 2005 - 02:16:43 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 18 2005 - 02:16:43 EDT