Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 32, No. 163.
            Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
                   Hosted by King's Digital Lab
                       www.dhhumanist.org
                Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org


    [1]    From: Jim Rovira 
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares? (40)

    [2]    From: Ken Friedman 
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares? (28)

    [3]    From: Stephen Clark 
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares? (5)

    [4]    From: davep@davelinux.info
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares? (16)

    [5]    From: Marinella Testori 
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares? (13)

    [6]    From: Worthy Martin 
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares? (20)


--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2018-11-06 16:59:05+00:00
        From: Jim Rovira 
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares?

Ha, keep on setting free the hares, which I always think is just fine so
long as the main argument is coherent and uninterrupted.

Jim R


-- 
Dr. James Rovira 

   - Reading and History
    (Lexington Books,
   under contract)
   - Rock and Romanticism: Post-Punk, Goth, and Metal as Dark Romanticisms
    (Palgrave Macmillan,
   May 2018)
   - Rock and Romanticism: Blake, Wordsworth, and Rock from Dylan to U2
   
(Lexington
   Books, February 2018)
   - Assembling the Marvel Cinematic Universe: Essays on the Social,
   Cultural, and Geopolitical Domains
   ,
   Chapter 8 (McFarland Books, 2018)
   - Kierkegaard, Literature, and the Arts
   ,
   Chapter 12 (Northwestern UP, 2018)
   - Blake and Kierkegaard: Creation and Anxiety
   
(Continuum,
   2010)

Active CFPs

   - Women in Rock/ Women in Romanticism
   ,
   edited anthology
   - David Bowie and Romanticism
   ,
   edited anthology


--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2018-11-06 19:47:17+00:00
        From: Ken Friedman 
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares?

Dear Jeremy,

This is an interesting question. There are many reasons to write essays 
— opening useful questions is one of them, even if you can’t answer the 
question you open.

This is especially the case for essays in the context of an intellectual 
community when you want to circulate an idea for consideration.

You might need a therapist, but not for this!

Yours,

Ken   

Ken Friedman, Ph.D., D.Sc. (hc), FDRS | Editor-in-Chief | 
设计 She Ji. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation | 
Published by Tongji University in Cooperation with Elsevier | 
URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/she-ji-the-journal-of-design-economics-and-innovation/

Chair Professor of Design Innovation Studies | College of Design 
and Innovation | Tongji University | Shanghai, China ||| 
Email ken.friedman.sheji@icloud.com | 
Academia http://swinburne.academia.edu/KenFriedman | 
D&I http://tjdi.tongji.edu.cn 




--[3]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2018-11-06 11:31:28+00:00
        From: Stephen Clark 
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares?

Release as many as you can. Long may they escape capture

Stephen Clark



--[4]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2018-11-06 12:04:11+00:00
        From: davep@davelinux.info
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares?

Hare-coursing is illegal. Release those hares. The 'peer review' system is
broken. They always want to write the article which they would have
written, which doesn't preclude the one which you want to write.
DP





-- 
http://www.historicalresources.myzen.co.uk (research and pedagogy)
I use Lilo web search: no tracking and social good (Firefox add-on)
This machine runs on liquid Linux
Often coming to you via TOR (The Onion Router)
De Havilland Fellow, University of Hertfordshire


--[5]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2018-11-06 12:14:13+00:00
        From: Marinella Testori 
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares?

Dear Willard,

I think you should keep on 'releasing the hares'.
Far from being a sign that you do not know how to catch them, as implicitly
inferred by your reviewer, I think they are an expression of your usual
respect for your readers' ability to understand by themselves without being
forced to follow an openly given direction. The wise readers, nevertheless,
clearly see what you are indicating.

Kind regards,
Marinella



--[6]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2018-11-06 12:51:03+00:00
        From: Worthy Martin 
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.161: is it necessary to catch the hares?

Willard,

   Let a thousand flowers bloom and thousands of bunnies run!!

Cheers,

   Worthy



____________________________________________

W.N. Martin
Department of Computer Science
and
Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities
University of Virginia





_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted
List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org
List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org
Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/
Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php

Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)

This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.