Home | About | Subscribe | Search | Member Area |
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 32, No. 177. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org [1] From: Willard McCartySubject: conditionalities (19) [2] From: Peter Batke Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.176: releasing the hares (38) [3] From: savoye@eapoe.org Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.176: releasing the hares (17) [4] From: Susan Ford Subject: RE: [Humanist] 32.176: releasing the hares (6) --[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2018-11-10 08:28:54+00:00 From: Willard McCarty Subject: conditionalities Responses to my question about releasing hares, esp Michael Sperberg-McQueen's, lead me to further questions on the wisdom of doing so in relation to the field, subfield, and/or practices involved. Consider, for example, literary studies, mathematics, the creative arts, engineering and digital humanities. Would it be the case that the more mature (or conservative?) the area of questioning, the more directed to successful application, proof or result and the more vulnerable to fraud the less releasing hares willy-nilly would be regarded as wise? Yours, WM -- Willard McCarty (www.mccarty.org.uk/), Professor emeritus, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London; Adjunct Professor, Western Sydney University; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews (www.tandfonline.com/loi/yisr20) and Humanist (www.dhhumanist.org) --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2018-11-10 11:52:51+00:00 From: Peter Batke Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.176: releasing the hares -Now that some of us are all getting old it may be time to revisit our younger days when mark up was something teacher did to poor essays. Certainly the rabbits of SGML have been let loose and multiplied - they have covered the earth and no one has bothered to catch just one. I would like to comment on one of the final paragraphs of Michael Sp-McQu's meander through some the rabbit tracks. There he takes a swipe at Jerome McGann who has accumulated a superb collection of rabbit pelts, I will only mention "Radiant Textuality" (five Michelin Stars) and whose great failing in the eyes of Sp-McQu is not falling in with the Legions of Markup. The failing of mark-up which were vaguely obvious even in early days at ACH (or was it still ICCH) in Toronto was that texts were to be painted on the screen via layers of embedded codes. (No need to respond - heard it all). The project was computer calligraphy - it swept all before it - and it will not rest till every textual mark affixed on any surface in the course of extant textual representation. Mark-up was chosen because data structures were felt to be too hard for humanists, give them CS-lite. Meanwhile it has dawned on me that the interaction between mind and marks (text) builds complex mental structures, which certainly can be aided algorithmically, but it is about the metal (inter-ocular or wherever) structures which have to be experienced personally - by a living entity. Prof. McCann has known this all along. My form of markup forces me to look at every sentence of a text - so my wandering attention and my diminishing eyes do not trips to the dump before delivering materials for building the mental structures. At present I have Franz Rosenzweig's Der Stern der Erlösung hopping around in front of me, mocking me - just wait, there is a place above my mantle next to Spinoza. Peter Batke http://www.humancomp.org/batke/ https://www.facebook.com/peter.batke.9 --[3]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2018-11-10 13:40:49+00:00 From: savoye@eapoe.org Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.176: releasing the hares I would suggest that releasing some hares in an article or lecture is fine as long as that is not all the presenter accomplishes. (There may, for example, be a main question well answered, and some related threads left dangling.) In rare instances, it may be appropriate to release a hare with the plans for a trap to catch the hare, requiring some specialized information not yet available. In working on my own projects, I often have many hares running around while I am busy catching others. The question may be whether or not it is purposeful or desirable to make public projects that are not yet at or near a state of completion. (In general, I am of the opinion that something reasonably substantive is better than nothing, perpetually waiting for perfection.) Jeffrey A. Savoye The Edgar Allan Poe Society of Baltimore https://www.eapoe.org --[4]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2018-11-10 09:02:42+00:00 From: Susan Ford Subject: RE: [Humanist] 32.176: releasing the hares When you start a hare you don't know whether it's catchable - but others on the list might. That is the point of the list (and the hare). Susan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.