Home | About | Subscribe | Search | Member Area |
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 32, No. 213. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org [1] From: davep@davelinux.info Subject: devices (15) [2] From: Willard McCartySubject: limitations of devices (39) --[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2018-11-21 07:49:06+00:00 From: davep@davelinux.info Subject: devices Mentions have been made about reading ebooks on tablets. I find them (tablets) rather ineffective. My preference is my ereaders, an old Nook and a more recent Bookeen Cybook Muse (and in the latter case, I can access books which are quite difficult to acquire otherwise). (Verso, of course, provides a free ebook with most purchases of hard copy). -- http://www.historicalresources.myzen.co.uk (research and pedagogy) I use Lilo web search: no tracking and social good (Firefox add-on) This machine runs on liquid Linux Often coming to you via TOR (The Onion Router) De Havilland Fellow, University of Hertfordshire --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2018-11-21 05:19:37+00:00 From: Willard McCarty Subject: limitations of devices Pat Galloway's practice of annotating ("I scribble all over my books...") is part of a venerable tradition, e.g. among the Carolingian glossators of the 9th and 10th Centuries. But, working on the pages of very expensive manuscripts, under supervision and the thumb of the powerful, they often created great works of scholarship that are still not terribly well understood. Today's scribblers in the margins of (relatively) cheap printed books leave behind momentary thoughts that usually aren't great works in themselves, though the marginal scribblings of a great scholar might be. I once imitated the Carolingians, carefully, with an edged pen, annotating as I read. But then, years later, reading my younger self's thoughts, was embarrassed, and so stopped doing that. Later still, branching out in subject matter and so acquiring many more books, I avoid assiduously any used book with annotations in it -- seldom are the thoughts and underscoring anything but annoying, and they interfere with OCR. So, now it's slips of paper, which in some cases I scan in and attach to a scanned copy of the book in question. Many variables make me seriously doubtful that anyone will ever produce a note-taking tool for all seasons and annotators. That said, I am mightily impressed (enough to use it all the time, but not at all times) the simple and elegant QwikCards. And, please note, I use it to print out those slips so that I can do what James Murray did when composing entries for the OED. "Hoc unum facio". he declared, and did it magnificently well. Yours, WM -- Willard McCarty (www.mccarty.org.uk/), Professor emeritus, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London; Adjunct Professor, Western Sydney University; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews (www.tandfonline.com/loi/yisr20) and Humanist (www.dhhumanist.org) _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.