Home | About | Subscribe | Search | Member Area |
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 32, No. 289. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org [1] From: Henry SchafferSubject: Re: [Humanist] 32.288: 'humanities' or 'human sciences' (14) [2] From: Ken Friedman Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.288: 'humanities' or 'human sciences' (34) --[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2018-12-23 00:32:49+00:00 From: Henry Schaffer Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.288: 'humanities' or 'human sciences' As a "scientist" I've long had trouble with the science-ness of some (not all) of the "social sciences" because of what I consider to be the subjective elements. An example, I like Kuhn's concept that if a theory isn't falsifiable, then it isn't science. I see the same problems in DH (i.e. in presentations/readings which are labelled DH) where I see resemblences with deconstruction which I consider to be (primarily, if not entirely) subjective. So I'm very uneasy about labeling *all* of DH or humanities as "human science". --henry schaffer --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2018-12-22 10:15:46+00:00 From: Ken Friedman Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.288: 'humanities' or 'human sciences' Dear Willard, Been thinking about this since your first asked the question. For me, the concept of the human sciences offers a bridge that links the social and behavioural sciences and the humanities, including the intriguing area where such fields as history can be treated either as one of the social sciences or among the humanities. Other fields such as philosophy can be seen usefully in the frame of the human sciences even though philosophy also includes logic, with its link to mathematics. The point is that we ought all to read more and to think more deeply: the framework of the human sciences encourages us to question assumptions and to walk around to think a bit. Dilthey's work and the perspective of interpretive hermeneutics and exegetics offer tools for better understanding what it is that human beings say and do. It never seemed to me that the human sciences stand in opposition to the humanities, but rather, support them. Warm wishes, Ken Ken Friedman, Ph.D., D.Sc. (hc), FDRS | Editor-in-Chief | 设计 She Ji. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation | Published by Tongji University in Cooperation with Elsevier | URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/she-ji-the- journal-of-design-economics-and-innovation/ Chair Professor of Design Innovation Studies | College of Design and Innovation | Tongji University | Shanghai, China ||| Email ken.friedman.sheji@icloud.com | Academia http://swinburne.academia.edu/KenFriedman | D&I http://tjdi.tongji.edu.cn _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.