Home | About | Subscribe | Search | Member Area |
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 32, No. 351. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org [1] From: Robert Delius RoyarSubject: Wikipedia and the center cannot hold (was Re: [Humanist] 32.340: centre to periphery) (18) [2] From: savoye@eapoe.org Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.314: thoughts on Wikipedia (30) --[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2019-01-16 12:17:34+00:00 From: Robert Delius Royar Subject: Wikipedia and the center cannot hold (was Re: [Humanist] 32.340: centre to periphery) The center may not exist. Perhaps humans imagine an infinite space of knowledge. Surely it has never been possible for anyone to all that there is to know in the time of one life; therefore, what is to know is in a real sense infinite. The infinite has no center. I reference an aging poem, "The Second Coming" written 100 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Second_Coming_(poem). Yeats' body of work (and this poem in particular) stands as an emblem of the crisis of time. Well, there is also the fact that the population of those educated to a professional life that continues or perishes on the discussion of knowledges and its (dis)contents became much broader than it had been (at least in the United States) within the period that Willard has noted the change from center focus to periphery. -- Robert Delius Royar Caught in the net since 1985 --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2019-01-16 10:14:23+00:00 From: savoye@eapoe.org Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.314: thoughts on Wikipedia As I think others have suggested, I find that Wikipedia is very useful as a summary and a staring point for deeper research. For many superficial questions, such as who is this or that celebrity of whom I have never heard previously, it is extremely helpful. (I understand that the general lament has been that with wikipedia and a cellphone, bar betting has been mostly eliminated, which, I suppose, might bother me if I frequented bars or placed such bets in them.) The chief caveat is, as has also been suggested, controversial topics. I know several people who maintain specific wikipedia pages, and they generally have a good grasp of the material and how to present it. (There is, not unexpectedly with such a large and disbursed effort, considerable variation in the quality and details of presentation.) In general, it should be remembered that wikipedia's expressed policy is to act as a digestion of already produced scholarship and information, actively discouraging new research or material that has not been published elsewhere in some form. (In theory, every main point should have a reference to accompany it.) While concerns about accuracy are valid, I note that in putting numerous scholarly books online, I find that pretty much all of them contain major errors in points and minor errors in spelling or references. (Oddly, newer books often have more troubles of this sort than older ones, although older ones have the problem of being behind in terms of content.) The advantage of wikipedia is that such errors can, at least in theory, be corrected. (On the other hand, the same mechanism also allows for the creation of new problems.) Jeffrey A. Savoye The Edgar Allan Poe Society of Baltimore https://www.eapoe.org _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.