Home | About | Subscribe | Search | Member Area |
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 32, No. 421. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org [1] From: John LaudunSubject: The purposeful mistake (31) [2] From: Mark Wolff Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.419: deliberate imperfection or asymmetry? (46) [3] From: Alec McAllister Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.419: deliberate imperfection or asymmetry? (7) [4] From: Inna Kizhner Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.419: deliberate imperfection or asymmetry? (29) --[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2019-02-04 16:58:32+00:00 From: John Laudun Subject: The purposeful mistake Hello, Willard! Actually the idea of an introduced flaw into weaving in Persian carpets is entirely an invention of European, and later American, merchants. Henry Glassie pretty thoroughly debunks it in "Turkish Traditional Art Today." As he describes it, weavers aspire to perfection but understand as mere mortals that their work will inevitable be flawed. As they note: "Only God is perfect." Perhaps the mercantile version of this was not so much intentional as a simple misunderstanding that then, as so many things do, stuck. In a similar vein, as someone who has made the run to the North Carolina pottery district a few times over the years, it saddened me to see the rise of pottery that was purposeful made to look handmade: unnecessarily heavy and uncomfortable. Weirdly, a second renaissance among the potters seems to have displaced that. But NC pottery long ago left behind its "folk" nature and has long been at the mercy of larger marketplaces of art dealers and tourists. Each potter has to navigate for him or herself their own economic viability. Best, jl -- John Laudun Doris H. Meriwether/BORSF Endowed Professor Department of English University of Louisiana at Lafayette Lafayette, LA 70504-4691 laudun@louisiana.edu --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2019-02-04 16:52:55+00:00 From: Mark Wolff Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.419: deliberate imperfection or asymmetry? Hi Willard. Georges Perec implemented what he called the clinamen (from Lucretius) in order to introduce an element of unpredictability in his work. The most famous example is the missing chapter between 66 and 67 of Life A User’s Manual, where Perec deliberately did not follow his procedure of using the knight’s move in chess to touch every square on a 10x10 grid. In an interview in 1981, Perec insists it is important to include anti-constraints within a system of constraints: ‘[the system] must not be rigid, there must be some play in it, it must, as they say, “creak” a bit; it must not be completely coherent […]’ (see Motte, Warren F., Jr. “Clinamen Redux.” Comparative Literature Studies, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. p263-281). According to Harry Mathews, “For Oulipians, the clinamen is a deviation from the strict consequences of a restriction. It is often justified on aesthetic grounds: resorting to it improves the results. But there is a binding condition for its use: the exceptional freedom afforded by a clinamen can only be taken on the condition that following the initial rule is still possible. In other words, the clinamen can only be used if it isn’t needed.” (Mathews, Harry, and Alastaire Brotchie. Oulipo Compendium. Atlas Press, 1998.). I recently published an article on Perec where I argue that several of Perec’s texts explore the possibilities of combining rule-based systems with indeterminate exceptions through an approach that aligns with Alan Turing’s theory of computation: Wolff, Mark. “Invoking the Oracle: Perec, Algorithms and Conceptual Writing.” The Afterlives of Georges Perec, edited by Rowan Wilken and Justin Clemens, Edinburgh University Press, 2017, pp. 85–101. Best, mw -- Mark B. Wolff, Ph.D. Professor of French Chair, Modern Languages One Hartwick Drive Hartwick College Oneonta, NY 13820 (607) 431-4615 http://markwolff.name/ --[3]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2019-02-04 12:23:52+00:00 From: Alec McAllister Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.419: deliberate imperfection or asymmetry? Has anyone ever researched the possibility that the whole "deliberate mistake" trope might simply have been a glib response to a customer spotting an accidental mistake? Alec McAllister University of Leeds (retired) --[4]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2019-02-04 09:19:48+00:00 From: Inna Kizhner Subject: Re: [Humanist] 32.419: deliberate imperfection or asymmetry? Dear Willard, Viktor Erlich's famous book on Russian Formalism cites Andrei Belyj's work from 1910 as an example of approach to poetic rhythm as the 'symmetry of deviations from the meter' (Belyj, 1910, cited from Erlich, 2012). Erlich writes further 'In his study.. he (Belyj) tends to judge the rhythmical richness of a poem by the frequency of deviations from the metrical scheme or, more exactly, by the number of missing accents'. Brjusov, another Russian poet, commented on this observation saying that 'Missing accents become a factor of rhythmical gracefulness and ease only 'if they occur in felicitous combinations with caesuras and with other elements of verse', if this is not the case, they may produce the impression of clumsiness' (Erlich, 2012, p. 38). This last combinatorics comment seems to be in line with your last observation on computing and unpredictability. This may be also true for carpets, other cases of decorative motifs, music, and dialogues in standard communicative situations when the most interesting exchange starts when we have deviations from standards that are in harmony with other characteristics. Best Inna Kizhner Department of Digital Humanities Siberian Federal University Russia _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.