Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 33, No. 383.
            Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
                   Hosted by King's Digital Lab
                       www.dhhumanist.org
                Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org




        Date: 2019-11-07 14:17:04+00:00
        From: Willard McCarty 
        Subject: best examples?

I'm looking for learned opinions as to the best, most convincing
examples of computationally generated results that indicate an
algorithmic or plausibly algorithmic basis for human artistic or
otherwise cultural artefacts. Citations to articles or books that make
the argument or attack it would be most welcome. Without surrendering 
(a favourite word over here these days...) to the dark side, what 
would you point to that you regard as genuinely interesting, i.e. 
that yields better questions about the human?

Many thanks.

Yours,
WM
--
Willard McCarty (www.mccarty.org.uk/),
Professor emeritus, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College
London; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
(www.tandfonline.com/loi/yisr20) and Humanist (www.dhhumanist.org)




_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted
List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org
List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org
Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/
Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php

Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)

This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.