Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 33, No. 383. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: email@example.com Date: 2019-11-07 14:17:04+00:00 From: Willard McCarty
Subject: best examples? I'm looking for learned opinions as to the best, most convincing examples of computationally generated results that indicate an algorithmic or plausibly algorithmic basis for human artistic or otherwise cultural artefacts. Citations to articles or books that make the argument or attack it would be most welcome. Without surrendering (a favourite word over here these days...) to the dark side, what would you point to that you regard as genuinely interesting, i.e. that yields better questions about the human? Many thanks. Yours, WM -- Willard McCarty (www.mccarty.org.uk/), Professor emeritus, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews (www.tandfonline.com/loi/yisr20) and Humanist (www.dhhumanist.org) _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: firstname.lastname@example.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.