Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 33, No. 434.
            Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
                   Hosted by King's Digital Lab
                       www.dhhumanist.org
                Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org


    [1]    From: Marinella Testori 
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 33.433: going wrong? getting it right? (68)

    [2]    From: Federico Pianzola 
           Subject: Re: [Humanist] 33.433: going wrong? getting it right? (8)


--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2019-11-23 16:21:05+00:00
        From: Marinella Testori 
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 33.433: going wrong? getting it right?

Dear Willard,

I think that you might consider to consult also the following resources:

Reason, James (1990). Human Error. Cambridge University Press.
Reason, James (2000). Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000;
320:768. doi: https://www.bmj.com/content/320/7237/768

which deal with the topic of error mainly from a psychological perspective.

Many thanks for your attention,
best wishes.

Marinella

-------------------------------
Dr Marinella Testori AKC
Linguistic Annotation and Lexicology for Latin

Il giorno sab 23 nov 2019 alle ore 09:25 Humanist 
ha scritto:

>                   Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 33, No. 433.
>             Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
>                    Hosted by King's Digital Lab
>                        www.dhhumanist.org
>                 Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org
>
>
>
>
>         Date: 2019-11-22 10:59:36+00:00
>         From: Willard McCarty 
>         Subject: going wrong
>
> I'd like to know more about what we gain, how we learn, from going
> wrong, from error, specifically in the digital realm, and contrariwise
> what we lose in the drive to be exact, precise, right. Of course one
> might say that by computing anything, one goes wrong, in that modelling
> always simplifies and digitising renders discrete that which isn't to
> us otherwise. And then there are different ways of being right or getting
> things right. Is it a matter of how one looks?
>
> Recommendations of readings on the topic of error would be welcome.
>
> I already have the following:
>
> Mach, Knowledge and error (1976/1905)
> Mayo, Error and the growth of experimental knowledge (1996)
> Allchin, Epistemology of error (2000)
> Allchin, Sacred bovines: The ironies of misplaced assumptions (2017)
> Oberkampf et al, Error and uncertainty in modelling and simulation (2002)
> Buchwald and Franklin, Wrong for the right reasons (2005)
> Hon, Schickore and Steinle, Going amiss in experimental research (2009)
> Pettman, Human error (2011)
>
> Others?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Yours,
> WM
> --
> Willard McCarty (www.mccarty.org.uk/),
> Professor emeritus, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College
> London; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
> (www.tandfonline.com/loi/yisr20) and Humanist (www.dhhumanist.org)


--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: 2019-11-23 09:54:14+00:00
        From: Federico Pianzola 
        Subject: Re: [Humanist] 33.433: going wrong? getting it right?

Some years ago I was a fellow at the Institute for Cultural Inquiry in
Berlin and they had a very interesting interdisciplinary project called
"Errans". They just published something about it:
www.ici-berlin.org/hot-off-the-press-re-an-errant-glossary/amp/

Federico Pianzola




_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted
List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org
List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org
Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/
Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php

Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)

This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.