Home | About | Subscribe | Search | Member Area |
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 34, No. 63. Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London Hosted by King's Digital Lab www.dhhumanist.org Submit to: humanist@dhhumanist.org [1] From: Willard McCartySubject: to late to stop the presses (34) [2] From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Subject: one more pedantic correction (25) --[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2020-05-26 12:25:29+00:00 From: Willard McCarty Subject: to late to stop the presses In my latest posting I mistakenly -- despite the poor fit -- expanded the acronym ALGOL into "Algebraic Language" rather than its true original, "Algorithmic Language". I must have been thinking of IAL, its prototype, the "International Algebraic Language". See Alan J. Perlis, "The American side of the development of ALGOL", in ACM SIGPLAN Notices 13.8 (August 1978), where we find this: > Developments, prompted both by reasoning about an abstraction, and > experience with languages being used, accounted for much of the > excellence and balance in the language design that came to be known > as IAL, (The International Algebraic Language) achieved in a few days > at the Zurich meeting. At one point during the meeting, the acronym > Algol (Algorithmic language) was suggested as a name for the language > under design. It was not adopted, perhaps because it did not > emphasize the international effort involved. Once publicized, > discussed and debated, the " unspeakable" and pompous acronym, IAL, > gave way in 1959 to the more verbal and source independent Algol. What slips by uncommented, teasing me, is the change from 'algebraic' to 'algorithmic'. What might Perlis have meant by "pompous"? And "source independent"? Apologies for the error - and further flogging. Yours, WM -- Willard McCarty (www.mccarty.org.uk/), Professor emeritus, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews (www.tandfonline.com/loi/yisr20) and Humanist (www.dhhumanist.org) --[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2020-05-27 07:30:16+00:00 From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Subject: one more pedantic correction You say > the need for an 'algebraic' language was > felt strongly enough to drive the development of the hugely influential > ALGOL (short for 'Algebraic Language’). Looking at the reports this past week or so, I have been struck by the fact that while the 1958 ‘preliminary report’ describes the ‘international algebraic language’, IAL (the initialism survives in the name JOVIAL for a programming language derived from Algol 58), the 1960 report describes an ‘algorithmic language’ Algol. Several accounts in the History of Programming Languages conference proceedings mention the naming question, sometimes in the interest of reviving old disagreements. ******************************************** C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Black Mesa Technologies LLC cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com http://www.blackmesatech.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted List posts to: humanist@dhhumanist.org List info and archives at at: http://dhhumanist.org Listmember interface at: http://dhhumanist.org/Restricted/ Subscribe at: http://dhhumanist.org/membership_form.php
Editor: Willard McCarty (King's College London, U.K.; Western Sydney University, Australia)
Software designer: Malgosia Askanas (Mind-Crafts)
This site is maintained under a service level agreement by King's Digital Lab.